Case Presenter Solicitor Advocate or Barrister
Descrizione del posto
Texte original importé depuis Reed
Case Presenter (solicitor advocate or barrister)
Are you an experienced barrister or solicitor advocate with a background in working within a regulatory environment?
Do you thrive on the challenge of presenting complex cases, managing competing priorities, and delivering high-quality legal advocacy in a fast-paced environment?
Are you passionate about advocacy and have excellent people skills?
Key facts:
Full-time, permanent role
The team works primarily remotely, with occasional team days in London. You should be broadly commutable to London and able to attend the office when required. Hearings are conducted remotely apart from exceptional circumstances.
Salary:
London (within M25): up to c. £60,000 per annum
Elsewhere in the UK: up to c. £55,000 per annum
The role
This is a fantastic opportunity to work within a collaborative, values-driven team. You will be joining at an exciting time as the function continues to grow and develop. This role has become available because one of the team members is being promoted.
As a Case Presenter, your primary responsibility is to present our client’s disciplinary and regulatory cases before its committees. You will take ownership of a case from the point it meets the referral threshold, reviewing investigation papers and bundles, ensuring the evidence is sufficient to support the allegations, and presenting the case before the relevant committee.
You will be advising and providing guidance to our client with regard to the investigation of complaints against students, affiliates, members and firms. This also includes advising senior / executive management on an ad hoc basis to ensure that decisions made comply with regulatory law practice and judicial authority.
Day-to-day, you can expect:
-
Presenting approximately two hearings per week, conducted remotely in the majority of cases
-
Reviewing investigation reports ahead of referral to the Independent Assessor, typically managing 5-6 pre-reviews at any one time
-
Advising teams on case strategy, evidential matters, and regulatory requirements, both on live cases and on wider legal and policy questions
-
Handling post-hearing work, including reviewing committee decisions and managing appeal applications
-
Contributing to a culture of shared learning and continuous improvement across the team
About You
We are looking for a qualified Barrister or Solicitor Advocate with a current practising certificate and a background in advocacy, can be from criminal, civil, or regulatory tribunal settings.
You will also bring:
-
Significant advocacy experience, including persuasive oral advocacy and witness handling through cross examination.
-
Strong understanding of the public interest within a regulatory framework.
-
Strong knowledge of regulatory law and practice, including rules of evidence and procedure.
-
Good understanding of data protection law, practice, and procedure.
-
Knowledge or ability to develop expertise in relation to Judicial Review.
-
Experience of working within a Regulatory environment.
Interested?
Please note, we reserve the right to close this vacancy early if we receive sufficient applications for the role. Therefore, if you are interested, please submit your application as early as possible. Our email address is
Our privacy policy is available on our website: https://notices/
The services advertised by FJWilson Talent Services are those of a recruitment business.
We encourage applications from all sections of the community. Furthermore, qualifications and/or experience identified are indicative. We will consider applications from candidates who have comparable qualifications and/or experience for the role advertised.
Competenze chiave estratte
La nostra IA ha analizzato l'offerta per identificare le competenze richieste.
I nostri consigli per candidarsi
5 recommandations générées par notre IA pour maximiser vos chances.
⭐ Lead your CV personal statement with your practising certificate status and the specific tribunal settings (criminal, civil, or regulatory) in which you have advocated, as the advert lists these as primary qualifications.
📊 Quantify your caseload: e.g. 'Managed a portfolio of 40+ active regulatory cases simultaneously, presenting 2-3 hearings per week before disciplinary committees.'
🎯 Explicitly reference your experience with cross-examination and witness handling, as the advert calls these out as distinct requirements under 'About You'.
🌐 Highlight any data protection law knowledge (GDPR, UK GDPR) and Judicial Review experience in a dedicated 'Key Competencies' section, as these are specifically listed skills.
🤝 Include a bullet on contributing to team learning or policy development, as the advert emphasises 'shared learning and continuous improvement' as a cultural expectation of the role.
Bullets CV suggérés
3 bullets générés par notre IA pour cette offre, alignés sur ses mots-clés ATS.
Ajoutez ces 3 bullets sous votre expérience la plus récente :
- •Presented over 90 regulatory disciplinary hearings per year before independent committees, achieving a 78% case outcome rate in favour of the referring body across a 3-year period.
- •Managed concurrent pre-review of 6 investigation bundles at any one time, reducing referral-to-hearing preparation time by 20% through a standardised evidential sufficiency checklist.
- •Advised executive management on 15+ regulatory compliance decisions annually, ensuring alignment with judicial authority and data protection law, with zero successful Judicial Review challenges.
Copier est gratuit — adapter nécessite un upload CV (30s).
Votre lettre de motivation est prête
Nous avons rédigé une lettre pour The Guardian. Découvrez l'ouverture, puis débloquez la version complète personnalisée.
Aperçu — adapté à The Guardian
Dear Hiring Manager,
The Case Presenter role at The Guardian — requiring a practising Barrister or Solicitor Advocate with a grounding in regulatory law and disciplinary advocacy — aligns precisely with the direction my career has taken over the past several years. My experience presenting cases before regulatory and disciplinary committees, combined with a strong command of rules of evidence and cross-examination technique, positions me well to contribute from day one.
My background in regulatory tribunal advocacy has equipped me with the case management discipline needed to handle approximately two hearings per week while simultaneously managing pre-review bundles and advising on case strategy. I have advised senior stakeholders on decisions requiring compliance with regulatory law and judicial authority, and I understand the weight of the public interest considerations that underpin disciplinary proceedings.
Inscription gratuite, sans carte. L'export PDF/Word nécessite l'essai 1,99 € (14 jours).
Domande probabili del colloquio
10 questions générées à partir de cette offre.
Tecniche
- ›Walk us through your process for reviewing an investigation bundle ahead of a regulatory hearing — what are the key evidential tests you apply?
- ›How do you assess whether evidence meets the referral threshold in a disciplinary regulatory context?
- ›Describe your approach to advising senior management on decisions that must comply with regulatory law and judicial authority.
- ›What is your understanding of the public interest test in a regulatory prosecution, and how have you applied it in practice?
- ›How have you handled or prepared for a Judicial Review challenge arising from a regulatory committee decision?
Comportamentali
- ›Tell me about a time you managed competing case priorities under significant time pressure — how did you organise your workload?
- ›Describe a situation where you had to present a complex or evidentially weak case before a tribunal. How did you approach it?
- ›Give an example of when you identified a gap in a team's understanding of regulatory procedure and took steps to address it.
- ›Tell me about a time you had to advise a senior stakeholder on a legally sensitive decision. How did you manage the communication?
- ›Describe a case where your cross-examination of a witness materially changed the outcome of a hearing.
Exemples de réponses STAR
Réponses modèles avec la méthode Situation-Tâche-Action-Résultat. À adapter à votre vécu.
Describe a situation where you had to present a complex or evidentially weak case before a tribunal. How did you approach it?
Tell me about a time you managed competing case priorities under significant time pressure — how did you organise your workload?